In Your Area Citizens' Advisory Committees Texas Corridors New Toll Roads Congestion Relief Safer Roads & Evacuations Economic Opportunities Connecting Communities Local Control Better Air Quality Project Funding Options Stay Informed Events & Public Hearings Question or Comment? News e-Newsletters Podcast FAQs Sitio en Español

I-69/TTC - Tier One DEIS

Print This Page « Send to a friend

The I-69/TTC Tier One Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was released for public review and comment on November 9, 2007. Use the links below to view the DEIS; visit the Environmental Studies and Maps page to learn more about the DEIS and the I-69/TTC environmental process. Please click on document title to see a document description.

View Detailed Maps of Recommended Preferred Alternative (narrowed study area)

Volume 1

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Download Here 01 Summary and Overview Map
General overview of the I-69/TTC Project and Tier One DEIS

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 324 KB

Download Here 02 Signature page
DEIS signature page including signatures of FHWA and TxDOT officials.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 192 KB

Download Here 03 Abstract
Very brief summary of the I-69/TTC Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 24 KB

Download Here 04 Executive Summary - English Version
Executive Summary of the I-69/TTC Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 16.6 MB

Download Here 04 Executive Summary - Spanish Version
Spanish version of the I-69/TTC Tier One DEIS Executive Summary

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 15.1 MB

Download Here 06 Preface


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 20 KB

Download Here 07 Table of Contents


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 260 KB

Download Here 08 Chapter 1- Purpose and Need
Technical report summarizing information and data to support the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 364 KB

Download Here 09 Chapter 2 - Alternatives
Description of the Tier One alternatives development process and analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 172 KB

Download Here 10 Chapter 3 - Environmental Evaluation
Description and analysis of environmental resources and characteristics within the study area, as well as identification of potential environmental effects by alternative.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.6 MB

Download Here 11 Chapter 4 - Transportation Planning Evaluation
Description of the transportation environment within the study area, as well as evaluation of transportation factors by alternative.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 204 KB

Download Here 12 Chapter 5 - Indirect and Cumulative Effects
Broad description of potential indirect and cumulative effects associated with new location and No Action alternatives.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 164 KB

Download Here 13 Chapter 6 - Recommended Preferred Alternative Identification
Discussion of the identification and evaluation of the Recommended Preferred Alternative.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 68 KB

Download Here 14 Chapter 7 - List of Preparers and Reviewers
List of individuals and organization involved in preparing the Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 48 KB

Download Here 15 Chapter 8 - Draft Environmental Impact Statement Distribution List
List of agencies, organizations, officials, and individuals who received copies of the Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 116 KB

Download Here 16 Chapter 9 - Comments and Coordination
Discussion of public involvement efforts, agency coordination, and the comment evaluation process for the Tier One environmental study.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 272 KB

Download Here 17 Chapter 9 Comment Summary
Summary of comments submitted to date for the Tier One environmental study.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 5.6 MB

Download Here 18 Chapter 10 - Index
Index of key words to assist in locating specific information.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 40 KB

Download Here 19 Chapter 11 - References
List of references used in the Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 84 KB

Download Here 20 Chapter 12 - Glossary and Acronyms
Definitions of transportation and environmental terms and acronyms used in the Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 56 KB

Volume 2

Figures

Download Here 21 Figure 2.1 Use of Existing/Planned Transportation Facilities Alternative
Map showing the alternative that incorporates the potential use of existing and planned facilities.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.1 MB

Download Here 22 Figure 2.2 Preliminary Corridor Alternatives
Map showing the preliminary corridor alternatives considered during the Tier One environmental study.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 23 Figure 2.3 Recommended Reasonable Corridors and Recommended Reasonable Connector Corridors
Map showing the recommended reasonable corridors and recommended reasonable connector corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 24 Figure 2.4 Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors
Map showing the best performing corridor alternatives in Section B

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 25 Figure 2.5 King Ranch and McAllen Ranch Historic Property Boundaries
Map showing the King Ranch and McAllen Ranch Historic Properties in relation to the I-69/TTC study area and corridor alternatives

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 604 KB

Download Here 26 Figure 2.6 Reasonable Corridor B1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B1, which begins north of US 59 at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer, George West, and Beeville. Northeast of Beeville, the corridor crosses US 59 south of Goliad. RC-B1 then turns east of Goliad and proceeds north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes north of Victoria and Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 27 Figure 2.7 Reasonable Corridor B2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B2, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer, George West, and Beeville. Northeast of Beeville, the corridor crosses US 59 south of Goliad. RC-B2 then turns northeast to pass east of Goliad and the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes north of Victoria and Edna, and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 28 Figure 2.8 Reasonable Corridor B3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B3, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer, George West, and Beeville. Northeast of Beeville, the corridor crosses US 59 south of Goliad. RC-B3 then passes south of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes south and east of Victoria. As the corridor approaches Lavaca River, it proceeds north of Edna, to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 29 Figure 2.9 Reasonable Corridor B4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B4, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer and George West. It then turns southeast and passes south and east of Beeville and Goliad. The corridor then passes north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. It continues to pass north of Victoria and Edna before reaching the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 30 Figure 2.10 Reasonable Corridor B5
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B5, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer and George West. It then turns southeast and passes south and east of Beeville, Goliad, and Coleto Creek Reservoir. East of Coleto Creek Reservoir, the corridor turns northeast to pass north of Victoria and Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 31 Figure 2.11 Reasonable Corridor B6
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B6, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. The corridor passes north of Freer and George West. It then turns southeast, crosses US 59, and passes south and east of Beeville. RC-B6 passes south of Goliad, the Coleto Creek Reservoir, and Victoria. As the corridor approaches Lavaca River, it proceeds north of Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 32 Figure 2.12 Reasonable Corridor B7
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B7, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south of George West, then proceeds north of Beeville. RC-B7 then passes south and east of Goliad and north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes north of Victoria and Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 33 Figure 2.13 Reasonable Corridor B8
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B8, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south of George West, then proceeds north of Beeville. Northeast of Beeville, the corridor again crosses US 59. RC-B8 then passes south of Goliad and south and east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes north of Victoria and Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 34 Figure 2.14 Reasonable Corridor B9
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B9, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south of George West, then proceeds north of Beeville. Northeast of Beeville, the corridor again crosses US 59. RC-B9 then passes south of Goliad and the Coleto Creek Reservoir. From the reservoir, the corridor passes south of Victoria. As the corridor approaches Lavaca River, it crosses US 59 and proceeds north of Edna and on to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 35 Figure 2.15 Reasonable Corridor B10
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B10, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south of George West, then proceeds south of Beeville. RC-B10 then passes south and east of Goliad crossing US 59, and north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir, Victoria, and Edna. RC-10 ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 36 Figure 2.16 Reasonable Corridor B11
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B11, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds northeast parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south of George West, then proceeds south of Beeville. RC-B11 then passes south of Goliad and south and east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. The corridor proceeds north crossing US 59, passes north of Victoria and Edna, and ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 37 Figure 2.17 Reasonable Corridor B12
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B12, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east parallel to US 59. Near the McMullen and Live Oak County line, it crosses US 59, passes south and east of George West, and then proceeds south of Beeville. RC-B12 then passes south of Goliad, the Coleto Creek Reservoir, and Victoria. As the corridor approaches Lavaca River, it crosses US 59 and proceeds north of Edna to the end of Evaluation Section B, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 38 Figure 2.18 Reasonable Corridor B13
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B13, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor proceeds north and west, parallel to US 59, passing south of Freer, south and east of George West, and north of Beeville. RC-B13 then passes south of Goliad, and north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir, Victoria, and Edna. The corridor ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 39 Figure 2.19 Reasonable Corridor B14
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B14, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, south and east of George West, and north of Beeville. RC-B14 then passes south of Goliad, and south and east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. The corridor proceeds north of Victoria and Edna, to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 40 Figure 2.20 Reasonable Corridor B15
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B15, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer and south and east of George West. It then crosses US 59, and passes north of Beeville. RC-B15 passes south of Goliad, the Coleto Creek Reservoir, and Victoria. As the corridor approaches Lavaca River, it proceeds north of Edna and ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 41 Figure 2.21 Reasonable Corridor B16
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B16, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, south and east of George West, south of Beeville and south, and east of Goliad. The corridor proceeds north of the Coleto Creek Reservoir and continues north of Victoria and Edna and on to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 42 Figure 2.22 Reasonable Corridor B17
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B17, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer and south and east of George West. It then passes south of Beeville and Goliad. The corridor then proceeds south and east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir and then north of Victoria and Edna to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 43 Figure 2.23 Reasonable Corridor B18
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B18, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer and south and east of George West. It then passes south of Beeville, Goliad, and the Coleto Creek Reservoir. The corridor then proceeds south of Victoria and then north of Edna to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 44 Figure 2.24 Reasonable Corridor B19
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B19, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, north of San Diego, Alice, and Agua Dulce towards Corpus Christi. Near the Jim Wells and Nueces County line, the corridor turns northeast and passes near San Patricio and west of Sinton, Woodsboro, and Refugio, paralleling US 77. At the San Antonio River, the corridor turns northwest and passes east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. RC-B19 then passes north of Victoria and Edna to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 45 Figure 2.25 Reasonable Corridor B20
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B20, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, north of San Diego, Alice, and Agua Dulce towards Corpus Christi. The corridor then passes near San Patricio and west of Sinton, Woodsboro, and Refugio, paralleling US 77. At the San Antonio River, the corridor turns northeast and passes south of Victoria. After the corridor crosses the Lavaca River, it proceeds north of Edna and ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 46 Figure 2.26 Reasonable Corridor B21
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B21, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, north of San Diego, Alice, and Agua Dulce towards Corpus Christi. The corridor turns northeast and passes near San Patricio, south and east of Sinton, and west of Woodsboro and Refugio paralleling US 77. At the San Antonio River, the corridor turns northwest and passes east of the Coleto Creek Reservoir. It then passes north of Victoria and Edna to its end, north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 47 Figure 2.27 Reasonable Corridor B22
Map showing Reasonable Corridor B22, which begins at the Laredo Potential Connection Zone, north of US 59, and proceeds east crossing US 59. The corridor passes south of Freer, north of San Diego, Alice, and Agua Dulce towards Corpus Christi. The corridor turns northeast and passes near San Patricio, south and east of Sinton, and then turns north, passing west of Woodsboro and Refugio, paralleling US 77. At the San Antonio River, the corridor turns northwest and passes south and east of Victoria. After the corridor crosses the Lavaca River, it proceeds north of Edna and ends north of Lake Texana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 48 Figure 2.28 Reasonable Corridor C1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor C1, which begins north of Lake Texana and extends northeast, parallel to US 59, passing west of El Campo and Wharton. RC-C1 then turns north towards I-10, passing east of Sealy and San Felipe. Once north of I-10, the corridor continues in a northerly direction passing west of Pine Island and Hempstead to the end of Evaluation Section C, at the Waller and Grimes County line.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 940 KB

Download Here 49 Figure 2.29 Reasonable Corridor C2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor C2, which begins north of Lake Texana and extends northeast, parallel to US 59, and passes west of El Campo and Wharton. RC-C2 then turns north towards I-10, passing west of Wallis then east of Sealy and San Felipe. Once north of I-10, the corridor turns to pass east of Pine Island and Prairie View and west of Waller, crossing US 290, and ending near the Waller and Grimes County line.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 932 KB

Download Here 50 Figure 2.30 Reasonable Corridor C3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor C3, which begins north of Lake Texana and extends northeast, parallel to US 59, and passes west of El Campo. The corridor then turns east to cross US 59 and passes south and east of Wharton. RC-C3 then turns north towards I-10, passing west of Wallis, east of Sealy and San Felipe, and then crosses I-10. Once north of I-10, the corridor turns northwest to pass west of Pine Island and Hempstead, and crosses US 290. From US 290, the corridor continues north ending near the Waller and Grimes County line.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 936 KB

Download Here 51 Figure 2.31 Reasonable Corridor C4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor C4, which begins north of Lake Texana and extends northeast, parallel to US 59, and passes west of El Campo. The corridor then turns east to cross US 59 and passes south and east of Wharton. RC-C3 then turns north towards I-10, passing west of Wallis, east of Sealy and San Felipe. Once north of I-10, the corridor turns to pass west of Pattison, then east of Pine Island and Prairie View, and then west of Waller. From US 290, the corridor continues north ending near the Waller and Grimes County line.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 928 KB

Download Here 52 Figure 2.32 Reasonable Corridor D1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D1, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity, south of Groveton and the Davy Crockett National Forest. The corridor then turns north to parallel US 59, passing west of Corrigan, Diboll, Burke, Lufkin, and Nacogdoches. RC-D1 then proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 53 Figure 2.33 Reasonable Corridor D2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D2, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton and the Davy Crockett National Forest. The corridor turns north to parallel US 59, passing east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. The corridor turns northwest past Lake Kurth, proceeds west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 54 Figure 2.34 Reasonable Corridor D3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D3, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, the corridor turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Diboll and passes east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. The corridor turns northwest to pass west of Lake Kurth, parallels US 59 to the west, and proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and east of US 259.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 55 Figure 2.35 Reasonable Corridor D4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D4, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, the corridor turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Diboll and passes east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. It then proceeds north, passing west of Huntington and then east of Lake Kurth, crossing the Angelina River, proceeding east of Nacogdoches, to the end of Evaluation Section D.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 56 Figure 2.36 Reasonable Corridor D5
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D5, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity, south of Groveton, and north of Corrigan. RC-D5 crosses US 59 north of Corrigan before turning north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to cross US 59 west of Lake Kurth. Once west of US 59, RC-D5 turns north to parallel US 59, proceeding west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 57 Figure 2.37 Reasonable Corridor D6
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D6, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity, south of Groveton, and north of Corrigan. RC-D6 crosses US 59 north of Corrigan before turning north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to cross US 59 west of Lake Kurth. Once west of US 59, RC-D6 turns north to parallel US 59, proceeding west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and east of US 259.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 58 Figure 2.38 Reasonable Corridor D7
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D7, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson until crossing SH 30 near the SH 30 and SH 90 intersection. The corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville. The corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity, south of Groveton, and north of Corrigan. RC-D7 crosses US 59 north of Corrigan before turning north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, Lufkin, and Nacogdoches. The corridor then proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, northeast of Nacogdoches.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 59 Figure 2.39 Reasonable Corridor D8
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D8, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, the corridor turns north to parallel US 59 and passes west of Corrigan, Diboll, Burke, Lufkin, and Nacogdoches. RC-D8 proceeds west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 60 Figure 2.40 Reasonable Corridor D9
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D9, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, the corridor turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Diboll and passes east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to cross US 59 west of Lake Kurth. RC-D9 proceeds west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 61 Figure 2.41 Reasonable Corridor D10
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D10, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, the corridor turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Diboll and passes east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to pass west of Lake Kurth, parallels US 59 to the west, and proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and east of US 259.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 62 Figure 2.42 Reasonable Corridor D11
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D11, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton. South of the Davy Crockett National Forest, RC-D11 turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Diboll before turning north to parallel US 59 and passes east of Diboll, Burke, Lufkin, and Nacogdoches. The corridor then proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, northeast of Nacogdoches.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 63 Figure 2.43 Reasonable Corridor D12
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D12, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton and north of Corrigan. RC-D12 crosses US 59 north of Corrigan before turning north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to pass west of Lake Kurth, proceeds west of Nacogdoches and on to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and the intersection of US 259 and US 84.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 64 Figure 2.44 Reasonable Corridor D13
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D13, which begins near the Waller and Grimes County line and passes east of Navasota and Anderson, and west of the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor then turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton, and north of Corrigan. RC-D13 then turns north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. After crossing SH 103, the corridor turns northwest to pass west of Lake Kurth, parallels US 59 to the west, and proceeds to the end of Evaluation Section D, north of Nacogdoches and east of US 259.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 65 Figure 2.45 Reasonable Corridor D14
Map showing Reasonable Corridor D14, which the Sam Houston National Forest. After crossing SH 30, the corridor turns northeast to pass northwest of Huntsville and cross I-45. Once north of I-45, the corridor turns north to cross the Trinity River and then turns east to pass north of Lake Livingston and Trinity and south of Groveton, and north of Corrigan. RC-D14 turns north to pass east of Diboll, Burke, and Lufkin. It then proceeds west of Huntington and then east of Nacogdoches to the end of Evaluation Section D.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 66 Figure 2.46 Reasonable Corridor E1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E1, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds north to pass east of Mount Enterprise and west of Lake Murvaul and Carthage. The corridor splits northwest of Carthage. The western leg of the corridor continues north, crossing the Sabine River and ending west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg proceeds northeast, crossing US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage, before turning east crossing SH 79 and ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 67 Figure 2.47 Reasonable Corridor E2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E2, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds north to pass east of Mount Enterprise and west of Lake Murvaul and Carthage. The corridor crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage before splitting east of the Sabine River. The western leg of the corridor continues north to end east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg turns east, crosses US 79, and ends south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,000 KB

Download Here 68 Figure 2.48 Reasonable Corridor E3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E3, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison and Timpson. After crossing US 84, the corridor turns north to pass west of Gary and Carthage. The corridor splits northwest of Carthage. The western leg of the corridor continues north, crossing the Sabine River and ending west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg proceeds northeast, crossing US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage, before turning east to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,000 KB

Download Here 69 Figure 2.49 Reasonable Corridor E4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E4, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison and Timpson. After crossing US 84, the corridor turns north to pass west of Gary and Carthage. The corridor crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage before splitting east of the Sabine River. The western leg of the corridor continues north to end east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg turns east, crossing US 79, and ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 992 KB

Download Here 70 Figure 2.50 Reasonable Corridor E5
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E5, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison and Timpson. The corridor splits south of Gary. The western leg extends north to pass west of Gary and Carthage and ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass northwest of Tenaha, crosses US 59 and the Sabine River, and ends south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,000 KB

Download Here 71 Figure 2.51 Reasonable Corridor E6
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E6, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison and Timpson. The corridor splits south of Gary. The western leg extends north to west of Gary and Carthage. The western leg then turns northeast to cross US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage and ends east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass northwest of Tenaha, crosses US 59 and the Sabine River, and ends south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,000 KB

Download Here 72 Figure 2.52 Reasonable Corridor E7
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E7, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison, Timpson, and Tenaha. After crossing the Sabine River the corridor splits. The western leg turns north, crosses US 79 and ends east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 73 Figure 2.53 Reasonable Corridor E8
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E8, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast to pass northwest of Garrison. The corridor splits north of Garrison. The western leg turns north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage. The western leg ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg turns east to cross US 59 northeast of Garrison and passes south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,000 KB

Download Here 74 Figure 2.54 Reasonable Corridor E9
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E9, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast to pass northwest of Garrison. The corridor splits north of Garrison. The western leg turns north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage. The western leg then turns northeast to cross US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage and ends east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg turns east to cross US 59 northeast of Garrison and passes south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 75 Figure 2.55 Reasonable Corridor E10
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E10, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and immediately splits into two legs. The western leg proceeds north to pass east of Mount Enterprise and west of Lake Murvaul and Carthage and ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison, Timpson, and Tenaha. The eastern leg crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Tenaha before ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 76 Figure 2.56 Reasonable Corridor E11
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E11, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and immediately splits into two legs. The western leg proceeds north to pass east of Mount Enterprise and west of Lake Murvaul and Carthage. The western leg crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage before ending east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59, to pass northwest of Garrison, Timpson, and Tenaha. The eastern leg crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Tenaha before ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 77 Figure 2.57 Reasonable Corridor E12
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E12, which begins northwest of Nacogdoches near US 259 and proceeds northeast to pass north of Garrison. The corridor splits north of Garrison. The western leg proceeds northeast to pass northwest of Timpson and Tenaha. The western leg crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Tenaha before turning north to cross US 79 and end east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg turns east to cross US 59 northeast of Garrison and passes south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 78 Figure 2.58 Reasonable Corridor E13
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E13, which begins near US 59 north of Appleby. The corridor extends east toward Pinkston Reservoir but turns northeast after crossing Naconiche Creek. The corridor splits north of Pinkston Reservoir. The western leg extends north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage before ending west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 79 Figure 2.59 Reasonable Corridor E14
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E14, which begins near US 59 north of Appleby. The corridor extends east toward Pinkston Reservoir but turns northeast after crossing Naconiche Creek. The corridor splits north of Pinkston Reservoir. The western leg extends north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage before turning northeast crossing US 59 and the Sabine River to end east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 80 Figure 2.60 Reasonable Corridor E15
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E15, which northeast after crossing Naconiche Creek. The corridor parallels US 59, passing east of Garrison, Timpson and Tenaha. RC-E15 splits east of Tenaha. The western leg extends north to cross the Sabine River and US 79 before ending east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Joaquin and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1, 012 KB

Download Here 81 Figure 2.61 Reasonable Corridor E16
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E16, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage. The corridor splits northwest of Carthage. The western leg continues north to cross the Sabine River and ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg proceeds northeast, crossing US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage, before turning east to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 82 Figure 2.62 Reasonable Corridor E17
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E17, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north to pass west of Timpson, Gary, and Carthage. The corridor crosses US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage before splitting east of the Sabine River. The western leg of the corridor continues north to end east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg turns east, crosses US 79, and ends south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 996 KB

Download Here 83 Figure 2.63 Reasonable Corridor E18
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E18, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north to pass west of Timpson. The corridor splits northwest of Timpson. The western leg continues north to pass west of Gary and Carthage before crossing the Sabine River and ending west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg turns to the northeast to pass northwest of Tenaha, crosses US 59 and the Sabine River, and ends south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 84 Figure 2.64 Reasonable Corridor E19
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E19, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north to pass west of Timpson. The corridor splits northwest of Timpson. The western leg extends north to pass west of Gary and Carthage. The western leg then turns northeast to cross US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage and end east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass northwest of Tenaha, cross US 59 and the Sabine River, and end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 85 Figure 2.65 Reasonable Corridor E20
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E20, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north to pass west of Timpson. The corridor then turns to the northeast to pass north of Timpson and Tenaha. After crossing the Sabine River the corridor splits. The western leg turns north, crosses US 79 and ends east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 86 Figure 2.66 Reasonable Corridor E21
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E21, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north. After crossing the Attoyac Bayou, the corridor splits. The western leg continues north to cross US 59 and pass west of Timpson, Gary and Carthage. The western leg ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg proceeds northeast to pass east of Tenaha before crossing the Sabine River and ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 87 Figure 2.67 Reasonable Corridor E22
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E22, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north. After crossing the Attoyac Bayou, the corridor splits. The western leg continues north to cross US 59 and pass west of Timpson, Gary and Carthage. The western leg then turns northeast to cross US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage and ends east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg proceeds northeast to pass east of Tenaha before crossing the Sabine River and ending south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 88 Figure 2.68 Reasonable Corridor E23
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E23, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds northeast to pass east of Garrison, Timpson, and Tenaha. After crossing the Sabine River, the corridor splits. The western leg turns to the north to cross US 79 before ending east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 89 Figure 2.69 Reasonable Corridor E24
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E24, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north. After crossing the Attoyac Bayou, the corridor splits. The western leg continues north to cross US 59 and pass west of Timpson, Gary and Carthage. The western leg ends west of US 59, south of I-20 and Marshall. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 90 Figure 2.70 Reasonable Corridor E25
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E25, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds north. After crossing the Attoyac Bayou, the corridor splits. The western leg continues north to cross US 59 and pass west of Timpson, Gary and Carthage. The western leg then turns northeast to cross US 59 and the Sabine River north of Carthage and end east of US 59 and south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Tenaha, Joaquin, and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,004 KB

Download Here 91 Figure 2.71 Reasonable Corridor E26
Map showing Reasonable Corridor E26, which begins northeast of Nacogdoches and proceeds northeast, parallel to US 59. The corridor splits east of Tenaha. The western leg turns north to cross the Sabine River and US 79 before ending east of US 59, south of I-20 and Scottsville. The eastern leg continues northeast to pass south of Joaquin and Logansport. After crossing the Toledo Bend Reservoir south of Logansport, the eastern leg turns north to end south of Stonewall.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 92 Figure 2.72 Reasonable Corridor F1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F1, which begins south of Marshall and west of US 59. It proceeds north to pass west of Marshall, Jefferson, and Linden. RC-F1 then turns northeast to pass northwest of Linden and Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 93 Figure 2.73 Reasonable Corridor F2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F2, which begins south of Marshall and west of US 59. It proceeds north to pass west of Marshall and Jefferson. RC-F2 then turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Linden, pass east of Linden, cross US 59 southwest of Atlanta, and pass west of Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 920 KB

Download Here 94 Figure 2.74 Reasonable Corridor F3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F3, which begins south of Marshall and west of US 59. It proceeds north to pass west of Marshall and Jefferson. RC-F3 then turns northeast to cross US 59 south of Linden and pass southeast of Linden and east of Atlanta. The corridor turns north east of Atlanta to meet US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 95 Figure 2.75 Reasonable Corridor F4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F4, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville before turning northwest to cross US 59 north of Marshall. The corridor passes west of Jefferson and Linden. RC-F4 then turns northeast to pass northwest of Linden and Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 912 KB

Download Here 96 Figure 2.76 Reasonable Corridor F5
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F5, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville before turning northwest to cross US 59 north of Marshall. The corridor passes west of Jefferson before turning northeast to cross US 59 south of Linden, pass east of Linden, cross US 59 southwest of Atlanta, and pass west of Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 920 KB

Download Here 97 Figure 2.77 Reasonable Corridor F6
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F6, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville before turning northwest to cross US 59 north of Marshall. The corridor passes west of Jefferson before turning northeast to cross US 59 south of Linden and pass southeast of Linden and east of Atlanta. The corridor turns north east of Atlanta to meet US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 920 KB

Download Here 98 Figure 2.78 Reasonable Corridor F7
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F7, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville and Jefferson before turning northwest to cross US 59 north of Jefferson. RC-F7 then passes west of Linden before turning northeast to pass northwest of Linden and Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 912 KB

Download Here 99 Figure 2.79 Reasonable Corridor F8
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F8, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville, Jefferson, and Linden and west of Atlanta. The corridor meets US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 100 Figure 2.80 Reasonable Corridor F9
Map showing Reasonable Corridor F9, which begins south of Scottsville and east of US 59. It proceeds north to pass east of Scottsville and Jefferson before turning northeast to pass east of Atlanta. The corridor turns north east of Atlanta to meet US 59 at the south end of the Texarkana Potential Connection Zone.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 101 Figure 2.81 Reasonable Connector Corridor S1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor S1, which begins northwest of El Campo and proceeds east to cross US 59 and SH 60, south of Wharton. Once past SH 60, it turns slightly northeast, passes south of Needville, and proceeds to its connection point with the Houston MTZ, southeast of Fairchilds.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 664 KB

Download Here 102 Figure 2.82 Reasonable Connector Corridor S2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor S2, which begins northwest of El Campo and proceeds east to cross US 59 and SH 60, south of Wharton. Once past SH 60, it turns slightly northeast, and at the San Bernard River the corridor turns north to pass northwest of Needville. The corridor ends at the Houston MTZ, west of Fairchilds.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 668 KB

Download Here 103 Figure 2.83 Reasonable Connector Corridor S3
Map showing Reasonable Corridor S3, which begins west of Wharton near the Colorado River and proceeds east crossing US 59 north of Wharton. The corridor passes south of Kendleton and Needville and proceeds to its connection point with the Houston MTZ, southeast of Fairchilds.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 660 KB

Download Here 104 Figure 2.84 Reasonable Connector Corridor S4
Map showing Reasonable Corridor S4, which begins west of Wharton near the Colorado River and proceeds east crossing US 59 north of Wharton. The corridor passes south of Kendleton and turns northeast to pass north of Needville. The corridor ends at the Houston MTZ, west of Fairchilds.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 664 KB

Download Here 105 Figure 2.85 Reasonable Connector Corridor S5
Map showing Reasonable Corridor S5, which begins north of Wharton. The corridor passes north of Kendleton and south of Beasley. The corridor ends at the Houston MTZ, west of Fairchilds.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 660 KB

Download Here 106 Figure 2.86 Reasonable Connector Corridor N1
Map showing Reasonable Corridor N1, which begins at Evaluation Section D corridors west of Corrigan. The corridor proceeds south and passes east of Onalaska, and west of Livingston and Goodrich. It then passes east of the Sam Houston National Forest, Shepherd, and Cleveland, to its connection with the Houston MTZ east of Plum Grove.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 107 Figure 2.87 Reasonable Connector Corridor N2
Map showing Reasonable Corridor N2, which begins at Evaluation Section D corridors west of Corrigan. The corridor proceeds south and passes west of Seven Oaks. It then passes east of Livingston, Goodrich, the Sam Houston National Forest, Shepherd, and Cleveland, to its connection with the Houston MTZ east of Plum Grove.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 108 Figure 2.88 Recommended Preferred Alternative
Map showing the Tier One Recommended Preferred Alternative for I-69/TTC.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 109 Figure 3.1 Study Area Ecoregions
Map showing the six ecoregions in the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 700 KB

Download Here 110 Figure 3.2 Land Use Index
Index of land use/land cover figures included in the Tier One DEIS.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.7 MB

Download Here 111 Figure 3.3 Cultural Resource Regions
Map showing the three archeological regions in the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 480 KB

Download Here 112 Figure 3.10 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures included in the Tier One DEIS that depict those evaluation grid cells within the I-69/TTC study area with the greatest potential to encounter wildlife habitat resources. Note: the Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool (GISST) Wildlife Habitat grid cells are scored on a range of values, 1 through 5. A score of 4 indicates 40 to 49 percent grid cell coverage, and a score of 5 indicates 50 percent or greater grid cell coverage.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 960 KB

Download Here 113 Figure 3.11 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Section B of the I-69/TTC study area that received a wildlife habitat evaluation score of 4 or 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 114 Figure 3.12 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area that received a wildlife habitat evaluation score of 4 or 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 115 Figure 3.13 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area that received a wildlife habitat evaluation score of 4 or 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 116 Figure 3.14 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a wildlife habitat evaluation score of 4 or 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 117 Figure 3.15 Wildlife Habitat 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a wildlife habitat evaluation score of 4 or 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 118 Figure 3.16 Pineywoods Mitigation and Conservation Area Approximate General Location
Map showing the approximate boundaries of the Pineywoods Mitigation and Conservation Area Segments and the Potential Pinewoods Mitigation and Conservation Area Lands

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 500 KB

Download Here 119 Figure 3.17 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Index
Index of figures included in the Tier One DEIS that depict those evaluation grid cells within the I-69/TTC study area with the greatest potential to encounter federal threatened and endangered species. Note: the Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool (GISST) Wildlife Habitat grid cells are scored on a range of values, 1 through 5. A score of 5 indicates 50 percent or greater grid cell coverage.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 868 KB

Download Here 120 Figure 3.18 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Section B of the I-69/TTC study area that received a federal threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 121 Figure 3.19 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area that received a federal threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 122 Figure 3.20 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area that received a federal threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 123 Figure 3.21 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a federal threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 124 Figure 3.22 Federal Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a federal threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 125 Figure 3.23 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Index
Index of figures included in the Tier One DEIS that depict those evaluation grid cells within the I-69/TTC study area with the greatest potential to encounter state threatened and endangered species. Note: the Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool (GISST) Wildlife Habitat grid cells are scored on a range of values, 1 through 5. A score of 5 indicates 50 percent or greater grid cell coverage.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Download Here 126 Figure 3.24 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Section B of the I-69/TTC study area that received a state threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 127 Figure 3.25 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area that received a state threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 964 KB

Download Here 128 Figure 3.26 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area that received a state threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 129 Figure 3.27 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a state threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 130 Figure 3.28 State Threatened and Endangered Species 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting those Geographic Information Systems Screening Tool grid cells within Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area that received a state threatened and endangered species evaluation score of 5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 131 Figure 3.29 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Index
Figure index depicting TEAP data including vegetation rarity, Natural Heritage rank, taxonomic richness, and rare species richness.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 888 KB

Download Here 132 Figure 3.30 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 133 Figure 3.31 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 134 Figure 3.32 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 135 Figure 3.33 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 136 Figure 3.34 TEAP Rarity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 137 Figure 3.35 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting TEAP data including contiguous native habitat, appropriate land cover, and a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD)-designated Ecologically Significant Stream Segment.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 920 KB

Download Here 138 Figure 3.36 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 139 Figure 3.37 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 996 KB

Download Here 140 Figure 3.38 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 141 Figure 3.39 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 142 Figure 3.40 TEAP Diversity 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 143 Figure 3.41 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting TEAP data including areas with a high resistance to disturbance and resilience to recover.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 904 KB

Download Here 145 Figure 3.42 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 146 Figure 3.43 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 968 KB

Download Here 147 Figure 3.44 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 148 Figure 3.45 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 149 Figure 3.46 TEAP Sustainability 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 150 Figure 3.47 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting TEAP data that include areas with high compiled value in Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) rarity, diversity, and sustainability.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 896 KB

Download Here 151 Figure 3.48 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 152 Figure 3.49 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 153 Figure 3.50 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 154 Figure 3.51 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 155 Figure 3.52 TEAP Composite 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include stream segments designated by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) as “ecologically significant.” Note: This is a Texas designation and there is no comparable Louisiana designation; therefore, there are no GISST Ecologically Significant Stream Segment cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 156 Figure 3.53 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Index
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 876 KB

Download Here 157 Figure 3.54 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Evaluation Section B


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 158 Figure 3.55 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 159 Figure 3.56 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 160 Figure 3.57 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 161 Figure 3.58 Ecologically Significant Stream Segment 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 162 Figure 3.59 Stream Density 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include stream, river, lake or reservoir shoreline.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,020 KB

Download Here 163 Figure 3.60 Stream Density 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.5 MB

Download Here 164 Figure 3.61 Stream Density 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 165 Figure 3.62 Stream Density 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 166 Figure 3.63 Stream Density 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 167 Figure 3.64 Stream Density 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 168 Figure 3.65 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include Texas stream segments with poor water quality (“impaired”), as defined by Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Note: GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 884 KB

Download Here 169 Figure 3.66 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 170 Figure 3.67 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 171 Figure 3.68 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 172 Figure 3.69 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 173 Figure 3.70 TMDL/CWA 303(d) 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 174 Figure 3.71 Floodplain 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include 100-year or 500-year floodplains, as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Note: GISST Floodplain data was available for 24 of 39 Texas counties and was not available for the two Louisiana parishes.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 900 KB

Download Here 175 Figure 3.72 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Floodplain data was not available for all corridors in Evaluation Section B.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 176 Figure 3.73 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 976 KB

Download Here 177 Figure 3.74 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 178 Figure 3.75 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Floodplain data was not available for Louisiana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 179 Figure 3.76 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Floodplain data was not available for Louisiana.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 180 Figure 3.77 Wetlands 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include wetlands.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 884 KB

Download Here 181 Figure 3.78 Wetlands 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 182 Figure 3.79 Wetlands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 972 KB

Download Here 183 Figure 3.80 Wetlands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 184 Figure 3.81 Wetlands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 185 Figure 3.82 Wetlands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 186 Figure 3.83 Managed Lands 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include publicly managed land. Note: GISST Managed Land does not include Texas State Forests, National Wilderness Areas, National Wild and Scenic Rivers, or Louisiana publicly owned land.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Download Here 187 Figure 3.84 Managed Lands 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 188 Figure 3.85 Managed Lands 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 968 KB

Download Here 189 Figure 3.86 Managed Lands 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 190 Figure 3.87 Managed Lands 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Managed Land data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST Managed Land cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 191 Figure 3.88 Managed Lands 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Managed Land data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST Managed Land cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 192 Figure 3.89 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include agricultural land.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 948 KB

Download Here 193 Figure 3.90 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 194 Figure 3.91 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 900 KB

Download Here 195 Figure 3.92 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 196 Figure 3.93 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 197 Figure 3.94 Agricultural Lands 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 198 Figure 3.95 Ozone Non-attainment Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include air quality areas of federal non-attainment and state-designated near non-attainment based on 2002 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and 1998 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality air quality criteria. Note: GISST Ozone Non-Attainment data was not available for Louisiana parishes.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 864 KB

Download Here 199 Figure 3.96 Ozone Non-attainment Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 200 Figure 3.97 Ozone Non-attainment Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 892 KB

Download Here 201 Figure 3.98 Ozone Non-attainment Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 202 Figure 3.99 Ozone Non-attainment Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area study area. Note: GISST Ozone Non-attainment data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST Ozone Non-attainment cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 203 Figure 3.100 GISST Ozone Non-attainment Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area study area. Note: GISST Ozone Non-attainment data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST Ozone Non-attainment cells in Louisiana corridors

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 204 Figure 3.101 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include areas of hazardous waste or toxic release based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality databases.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 888 KB

Download Here 205 Figure 3.102 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 206 Figure 3.103 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 207 Figure 3.104 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 208 Figure 3.105 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 209 Figure 3.106 GISST Hazardous Waste 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 210 Figure 3.107 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include minority persons, based on the 2000 Census and including all persons other than white, non-Hispanic.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 211 Figure 3.108 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 212 Figure 3.109 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1 MB

Download Here 213 Figure 3.110 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 214 Figure 3.111 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 215 Figure 3.112 GISST Percent Minority 2, 3, 4, and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 216 Figure 3.113 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Index
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include households that earn an income of $15,000 or less, based on the 2000 Census.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 888 KB

Download Here 217 Figure 3.114 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 218 Figure 3.115 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 219 Figure 3.116 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 220 Figure 3.117 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 221 Figure 3.118 GISST Percent Economically Stressed 4 and 5 Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 222Figure 3.119 Evaluation Sections B Colonias
Detailed map depicting documented colonias in south Texas. These are unincorporated settlements which may lack basic water and sewer systems, paved roads, electricity, and safe and sanitary housing.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Download Here 223 Figure 3.120 Land Use Evaluation Section B
Detailed map depicting land uses (e.g. residential, commercial/industrial, built-up, and agricultural) and land cover types (e.g. rangeland, forest land, wetland/water resources, and barren land) in the vicinity of and within Evaluation Section B.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 224 Figure 3.121 Land Use Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map depicting land uses (e.g. residential, commercial/industrial, built-up, and agricultural) and land cover types (e.g. rangeland, forest land, wetland/water resources, and barren land) in the vicinity of and within Evaluation Sections C and S.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 944 KB

Download Here 225 Figure 3.122 Land Use Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map depicting land uses (e.g. residential, commercial/industrial, built-up, and agricultural) and land cover types (e.g. rangeland, forest land, wetland/water resources, and barren land) in the vicinity of and within Evaluation Sections D and N.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 226 Figure 3.123 Land Use Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map depicting land uses (e.g. residential, commercial/industrial, built-up, and agricultural) and land cover types (e.g. rangeland, forest land, wetland/water resources, and barren land) in the vicinity of and within Evaluation Sections E and F.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.6 MB

Download Here 227 Figure 3.124 Land Use Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map depicting land uses (e.g. residential, commercial/industrial, built-up, and agricultural) and land cover types (e.g. rangeland, forest land, wetland/water resources, and barren land) in the vicinity of and within Evaluation Sections E and F.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 228 Figure 3.125 Cultural Resource Regions, Sites Listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and State Archeological Landmarks within Corridors
Texas Historical Commission Cultural Resources Regions, National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) sites, and State Archeological Landmarks (SAL).

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 548 KB

Download Here 229 Figure 3.126 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Index
Index of figures included in the Tier One DEIS that show the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 860 KB

Download Here 230 Figure 3.127 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Evaluation Section B
Detailed map showing the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation to Evaluation Section B.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 231 Figure 3.128 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Evaluation Sections C and S
Detailed map showing the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation to Evaluation Sections C and S.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1 MB

Download Here 232 Figure 3.129 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Evaluation Sections D and N
Detailed map showing the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation to Evaluation Sections D and N.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 233 Figure 3.130 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Evaluation Sections E and F, 1 of 2
Detailed map showing the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation to Evaluation Sections E and F.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.5 MB

Download Here 234 Figure 3.131 Oil and Natural Gas Wells Evaluation Sections E and F, 2 of 2
Detailed map showing the distribution of active and inactive oil and natural gas wells in relation to Evaluation Sections E and F.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.5 MB

Download Here 235 Figure 3.132 Evaluation Section Mine Locations
Study area map showing known documented past, existing, and proposed hard rock mines.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 236 Figure 4.1 Existing Highway Network
I-69/TTC study area map of the Texas Department of Transportation’s and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s networks of state, U.S. and interstate highways

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 237 Figure 4.2 Planned Roadway Projects
I-69/TTC study area map of the known planned Texas and Louisiana roadway projects through 2030

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 238 Figure 4.3 Hurricane Evacuation Routes
I-69/TTC study area map of the 2006 Texas primary and secondary hurricane evacuation routes

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.6 MB

Download Here 239 Figure 4.4 Existing and Abandoned Railroads
I-69/TTC study area map of the 2003 National Rail Network (existing and abandoned freight rail) as documented by the Federal Railroad Administration

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.4 MB

Download Here 240 Figure 4.5 Planned Rail Projects
I-69/TTC study area map of known planned freight rail capacity expansions/improvements

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.1 MB

Download Here 241 Figure 4.6 Planned Rail Projects Houston Metropolitan Area
Location of comprehensive passenger rail structure improvements proposed in 2004 and 2005 in Harris County and the Houston-Galveston Metropolitan Planning Organization’s planning area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 908 KB

Download Here 242 Figure 4.7 International Border Crossings
Location of existing and proposed Texas – Mexico international border crossing bridges.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 708 KB

Download Here 243 Figure 4.8 Study Area Airports and Seaports
Eight deep-draft Gulf of Mexico seaports and ten commercial airport locations within or adjacent to the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.3 MB

Download Here 244 Figure 4.10 Transportation Planning – Evaluation Section Preliminary Best Performing Corridors Index
Index of figures included in the Tier One DEIS that shows those Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 892 KB

Download Here 245 Figure 4.11 Transportation Planning Preliminary Best Performing Corridors Evaluation Sections B
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section B (RC-B20 and RC-B22), which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 246 Figure 4.12 Transportation Planning Preliminary Best Performing Corridors Evaluation Sections C and S
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section C (RC-C1 and RC-C2) and Reasonable Connector Corridors in Evaluation Section S (RCC-S3 and RCC-S5), which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 928 KB

Download Here 247 Figure 4.13 Transportation Planning Preliminary Best Performing Corridors Evaluation Sections D and N
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section D (RC-D5, RC-D6, RC-D12 and RC-D13) and Reasonable Connector Corridor in Evaluation Section N (RCC-N2), which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 248 Figure 4.14 Transportation Planning Preliminary Best Performing Corridors Evaluation Sections E and F (Prior to System Connectivity Analysis)
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Sections E (RC-E24, RC-E25, and RC-E26) and F (RC-F8), which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 249 Figure 4.15 Evaluation Sections D, E, and F: Lack of System Connectivity Resulting from Analysis
Points labeled where best performing corridors show lack of connectivity between Evaluation Sections D and E (all preliminary best performing corridors in these two sections do not connect) and Evaluation Sections E and F (RC-E24 does not connect to RC-F8)

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 250 Figure 4.16 Evaluation Sections D, E, and F System Connectivity: Best Performing Corridors (Post System Connectivity Analysis)
Evaluation Section D, E and F Reasonable Corridors which provide best performance after re-evaluation to resolve system connectivity (RC-D7, RC-D14, RC-E24, RC-E25, RC-F1 and RC-F8)

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 251 Figure 4.17 Transportation Planning - Best Performing Corridors
All Evaluation Section Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors which provide the best system performance and connectivity based on the transportation planning evaluation: RC-B20, RC-B22, RC-C1, RC-C2, RC-D7, RC-D14, RC-E24, RC-E25, RC-F1 and RC-F8; RCC-S3, RCC-S5 and RCC-N2.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 868 KB

Download Here 252 Figure 6.1 Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Reasonable Corridors (RC-B19, RC-C2, RC-D4, RC-E24 and RC-F1) and Reasonable Connector Corridors (RCC-S5 and RCC-N2) which combine to provide the best opportunity to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoid or minimize the potential for environmental effects. This combination is the New Location Recommended Preferred Corridor.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 736 KB

Download Here 253 Figure 6.2 Evaluation Section B: Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Recommended Preferred Corridor in Evaluation Section B (RC-B19) which provides the best opportunity to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoids or minimizes the potential for environmental effects.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 254 Figure 6.3 Evaluation Sections C and S: Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Recommended Preferred Corridor in Evaluation Sections C and S (RC-C2 and RCC-S5) which provide the best opportunities to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoid or minimize the potential for environmental effects.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 976 KB

Download Here 255 Figure 6.4 Evaluation Sections D and N: Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Recommended Preferred Corridor in Evaluation Sections D and N (RC-D4 and RCC-N2) which provide the best opportunities to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoid or minimize the potential for environmental effects.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 256 Figure 6.5 Evaluation Section E: Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Recommended Preferred Corridor in Evaluation Section E (RC-E24) which provides the best opportunity to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoids or minimizes the potential for environmental effects.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1 MB

Download Here 257 Figure 6.6 Evaluation Section F: Recommended Preferred Corridor
The Recommended Preferred Corridor in Evaluation Section F (RC-F1) which provides the best opportunity to meet the I-69/TTC Purpose and Need and better avoids or minimizes the potential for environmental effects.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 960 KB

Download Here 258 Figure 6.7 Floodplain 4 and 5 Evaluation Section D and N
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 259 Figure 6.8 Recommended Tier Two Study Areas
I-69/TTC Recommended Tier Two Study Areas showing the Tier One Recommended Preferred New Location Corridor, the routes that comprise the Use of Existing/Planned Transportation Facilities Alternative, the two Modal Transition Zones and three Potential Connection Zones.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 684 KB

Download Here 260 Figure 9.1 Public Scoping Meeting Locations
Eleven Public Scoping Meetings held in April 2004 throughout the I-69/TTC Study Area: Diboll, Texarkana, Humble, Victoria, Corpus Christi, Rosenberg, Kingsville, George West, Laredo, Weslaco (Rio Grande Valley).

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.9 MB

Download Here 261 Figure 9.2 Public Information Meeting Locations
Thirty-seven (37) Public Information Meetings held July through August, 2005, throughout the I-69/TTC Study Area to present Recommended Reasonable Corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 852 KB

Download Here 262 Figure 9.3 Comments by Zip Code Area: Prior to Scoping (12/8/02 to 1/14/04)
Graphic representation of public comments received between December 8, 2002 and January 14, 2004, outside of the official scoping period, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.2 MB

Download Here 263 Figure 9.4 Comments by Zip Code Area: Official Scoping Period (1/15/04 to 6/14/04)
Graphic representation of public comments received between January 15, 2004 and June 14, 2004, within the official public scoping period, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.2 MB

Download Here 264 Figure 9.5 Comments by Zip Code Area: Between Scoping and Public Information Meetings (6/15/04 to 6/14/05)
Graphic representation of public comments received between June 15, 2004 and June 14, 2005, between the end of the official scoping period and the beginning of the public information meeting comment period, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.1 MB

Download Here 265 Figure 9.6 Comments by Zip Code: Official Public Information Comment Period (6/15/05 to 8/29/05)
Graphic representation of public comments received between June 15, 2005 and August 29, 2005, during the official public information meeting comment period, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.3 MB

Download Here 266 Figure 9.7 Comments by Zip Code Area: After Public Information Comment Period (8/30/05 to 10/17/06)
Graphic representation of public comments received after the close of the official public information meeting comment period, between August 30, 2005 and October 17, 2006, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 828 KB

Download Here 267 Figure 9.8 All Comments by Zip Code Area (12/08/02 to 10/17/06)
Graphic representation of all public comments received between December 08, 2002, through October 17, 2006, by zip code within Texas and by state in the United States.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Volume 3

Appendices A through F

Download Here 268 Appendix A Purpose and Need Statement Support Document


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 916 KB

Download Here 269 Appendix B Engineering Criteria


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 64 KB

Download Here 270 Appendix C Historic Ranch Coordination


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 9.7 MB

Download Here 271 Appendix D Legislative Overview


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 168 KB

Download Here 272 Appendix E Corridor and Alignment Selection Effects on Property Values


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 273 Appendix F Land Use Tables


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 274 Appendix G Natural Resources Technical Memorandum


09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Volume 4

Appendices G through H

Download Here 275 Appendix G Figure 1.1
The five natural resources regions (ecoregions) within the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 700 KB

Download Here 276 Appendix G Figure 2.7
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include wildlife habitat resources.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 277 Appendix G Figure 2.8
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 278 Appendix G Figure 2.9
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,008 KB

Download Here 279 Appendix G Figure 2.10
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

Download Here 280 Appendix G Figure 2.11
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 281 Appendix G Figure 2.12
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 282 Appendix G Figure 2.13
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include federal threatened and endangered species.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Download Here 283 Appendix G Figure 2.14
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 284 Appendix G Figure 2.15
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 285 Appendix G Figure 2.16
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 286 Appendix G Figure 2.17
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 287 Appendix G Figure 2.18
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 288 Appendix G Figure 2.19
Index of figures depicting GISST data that state threatened and endangered species.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 876 KB

Download Here 289 Appendix G Figure 2.20
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 290 Appendix G Figure 2.21
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 968 KB

Download Here 291 Appendix G Figure 2.22
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 292 Appendix G Figure 2.23
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 293 Appendix G Figure 2.24
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 294 Appendix G Figure 2.25
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-designated Critical Habitat for federal endangered species which may occur in the I-69/TTC Study Area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 880 KB

Download Here 295 Appendix G Figure 2.26
Index of figures depicting TEAP data that areas with a combination of vegetation rarity, Natural Heritage rank, taxonomic richness, and rare species richness.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 888 KB

Download Here 296 Appendix G Figure 2.27
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 297 Appendix G Figure 2.28
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 984 KB

Download Here 298 Appendix G Figure 2.29
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 299 Appendix G Figure 2.30
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 300 Appendix G Figure 2.31
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 301 Appendix G Figure 2.32
Index of figures depicting TEAP data that include areas with a high probability of contiguous native habitat, appropriate land cover, and a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD)-designated Ecologically Significant Stream Segment.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 920 KB

Download Here 302 Appendix G Figure 2.33
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 303 Appendix G Figure 2.34
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 996 KB

Download Here 304 Appendix G Figure 2.35
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 305 Appendix G Figure 2.36
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 306 Appendix G Figure 2.37
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 307 Appendix G Figure 2.38
Index of figures depicting TEAP data that include areas with a high resistance to disturbance and resilience to recover.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 904 KB

Download Here 308 Appendix G Figure 2.39
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 309 Appendix G Figure 2.40
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 968 KB

Download Here 310 Appendix G Figure 2.41
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 311 Appendix G Figure 2.42
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 312 Appendix G Figure 2.43
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 313 Appendix G Figure 2.44
Index of figures depicting TEAP data that include areas with high compiled value in Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) rarity, diversity, and sustainability.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 892 KB

Download Here 314 Appendix G Figure 2.45
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 315 Appendix G Figure 2.46
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 984 KB

Download Here 316 Appendix G Figure 2.47
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 317 Appendix G Figure 2.48
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 318 Appendix G Figure 2.49
Detailed map depicting Texas Ecological Assessment Protocol (TEAP) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 319 Appendix G Figure 2.50
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include stream segments designated by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) as “ecologically significant.” Note: This is a Texas designation and there is no comparable Louisiana designation; therefore, there are no GISST Ecologically Significant Stream Segment cells in Louisiana corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 880 KB

Download Here 320 Appendix G Figure 2.51
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 321 Appendix G Figure 2.52
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 322 Appendix G Figure 2.53
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 323 Appendix G Figure 2.54
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 324 Appendix G Figure 2.55
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 325 Appendix G Figure 2.56
Two major aquifers crossed by the I-69/TTC study area corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 908 KB

Download Here 326 Appendix G Figure 2.57
Four minor aquifers crossed by the I-69/TTC study area corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 912 KB

Download Here 327 Appendix G Figure 2.58
River and coastal basins (watersheds) crossed by the I-69/TTC study area corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 640 KB

Download Here 328 Appendix G Figure 2.59
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include stream, river, lake or reservoir shoreline.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1,020 KB

Download Here 329 Appendix G Figure 2.60
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.5 MB

Download Here 330 Appendix G Figure 2.61
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 331 Appendix G Figure 2.62
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 332 Appendix G Figure 2.63
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 333 Appendix G Figure 2.64
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 334 Appendix G Figure 2.65
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include Texas stream segment with poor water quality (“impaired”), as defined by Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Note: GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) data was not available for Louisiana; therefore, there are no GISST TMDL/CWA 303(d) cells in Louisiana corridors

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 880 KB

Download Here 335 Appendix G Figure 2.66
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 336 Appendix G Figure 2.67
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 984 KB

Download Here 337 Appendix G Figure 2.68
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 338 Appendix G Figure 2.69
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 339 Appendix G Figure 2.70
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 340 Appendix G Figure 2.71
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include 100-year or 500-year floodplains, as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Note: GISST Floodplain data was available for 27 of 43 Texas counties and was not available for the two Louisiana parishes.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 900 KB

Download Here 341 Appendix G Figure 2.72
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 342 Appendix G Figure 2.73
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 980 KB

Download Here 343 Appendix G Figure 2.74
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 344 Appendix G Figure 2.75
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Floodplain data was not available for Louisiana and many of the Texas counties in these evaluation sections.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 345 Appendix G Figure 2.76
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area. Note: GISST Floodplain data was not available for Louisiana and many of the Texas counties in these evaluation sections.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 346 Appendix G Figure 2.77
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include wetlands.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 880 KB

Download Here 347 Appendix G Figure 2.78
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 348 Appendix G Figure 2.79
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 972 KB

Download Here 349 Appendix G Figure 2.80
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 350 Appendix G Figure 2.81
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 351 Appendix G Figure 2.82
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 352 Appendix G Figure 2.83
Coastal Barrier Resource System Units and other protected areas under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act along the Texas Gulf of Mexico coastline, relative to the I-69/TTC Study Area and corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 864 KB

Download Here 353 Appendix G Figure 2.84
Coastal Zone Management Areas along the Texas Gulf of Mexico coastline, relative to the I-69/TTC Study Area and corridors.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 892 KB

Download Here 354 Appendix G Figure 2.85
Index of figures depicting GISST data that include publicly managed land. Note: GISST Managed Land does not include Texas State Forests, National Wilderness Areas, National Wild and Scenic Rivers, or Louisiana publicly owned land.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 868 KB

Download Here 355 Appendix G Figure 2.86
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 356 Appendix G Figure 2.87
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 968 KB

Download Here 357 Appendix G Figure 2.88
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 358 Appendix G Figure 2.89
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 359 Appendix G Figure 2.90
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 360 Appendix G Figure 2.91
Index of figures depicting (GISST) data that includes agricultural land.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 944 KB

Download Here 361 Appendix G Figure 2.92
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Section B of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 362 Appendix G Figure 2.93
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections C and S of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 904 KB

Download Here 363 Appendix G Figure 2.94
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections D and N of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 364 Appendix G Figure 2.95
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 365 Appendix G Figure 2.96
Detailed map depicting Geographic Information System Screening Tool (GISST) data within Evaluation Sections E and F of the I-69/TTC study area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Download Here 366 Appendix H Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum
Study Area, including an inventory of historical and archaeological sites that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHPs), National Historic Landmarks (NHLs) and State Archeological Landmarks (SAL). This evaluation identified I-69/TTC Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors which may provide the best opportunities to avoid or minimize the potential to affect NRHPs, NHLs or SALs. This technical memorandum is summarized in the I-69/TTC DEIS Chapter Three Environmental Evaluation.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.3 MB

Volume 5

Appendix I

Download Here 367 Appendix I Transportation Planning Evaluation Technical Memorandum
The I-69/TTC Tier One DEIS Transportation Planning Technical Memorandum presents the methods, analysis, and findings of the transportation performance evaluation based on user benefit, supplemental performance, and system connectivity. This Technical Memorandum recommends the best performing New Location Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors in each Evaluation Section from a transportation perspective to best meet the Purpose and Need of I-69/TTC.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.1 MB

Download Here 368 Appendix I Figure 1.1
I-69/TTC study area map of the Texas Department of Transportation’s and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s networks of state, U.S. and interstate highways

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.7 MB

Download Here 369 Appendix I Figure 1.2
I-69/TTC study area map of the known planned Texas and Louisiana roadway projects through 2030

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.8 MB

Download Here 370 Appendix I Figure 1.3
I-69/TTC study area map of the 2006 Texas primary and secondary hurricane evacuation routes

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.6 MB

Download Here 371 Appendix I Figure 1.4
I-69/TTC study area map of the 2003 National Rail Network (existing and abandoned freight rail) as documented by the Federal Railroad Administration

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.4 MB

Download Here 372 Appendix I Figure 1.5
I-69/TTC study area map of known planned freight rail capacity expansions/improvements

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.1 MB

Download Here 373 Appendix I Figure 1.6
Location of comprehensive passenger rail structure improvements proposed in 2004 and 2005 in Harris County and the Houston-Galveston Metropolitan Planning Organization’s planning area.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 908 KB

Download Here 374 Appendix I Figure 1.7
Location of existing and proposed Texas – Mexico international border crossing bridges

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 704 KB

Download Here 375 Appendix I Figure 1.11
Eight deep-draft Gulf of Mexico seaports and ten commercial airports locations within or adjacent to the I-69/TTC study area

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 2.3 MB

Download Here 376 Appendix I Figure 2.4
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section B (RC-B20 and RC-B22), which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 377 Appendix I Figure 2.7
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section C (RC-C1 and RC-C2) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 976 KB

Download Here 378 Appendix I Figure 2.10
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section D (RC-D5, RC-D6, RC-D12 and RC-D13) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 379 Appendix I Figure 2.13
Reasonable Corridors in Evaluation Section E (RC-E24, RC-E25, and RC-E26) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1 MB

Download Here 380 Appendix I Figure 2.15
Reasonable Corridor in Evaluation Section F (RC-F8) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 956 KB

Download Here 381 Appendix I Figure 2.18
Reasonable Connector Corridors in Evaluation Section S (RCC-S3 and RCC-S5) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 708 KB

Download Here 382 Appendix I Figure 2.21
Reasonable Connector Corridor in Evaluation Section N (RCC-N2) which performed best in the User Benefit Analysis and the Supplemental Performance Analysis, which then are evaluated in the Evaluation Section Connectivity Analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.6 MB

Download Here 383 Appendix I Figure 2.22
Points labeled where best performing corridors show lack of connectivity between Evaluation Sections D and E (all preliminary best performing corridors in these two sections do not connect) and Evaluation Sections E and F (RC-E24 does not connect to RC-F8).

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 384 Appendix I Figure 2.32
Evaluation Section D, E and F Reasonable Corridors which provide best performance after re-evaluation to resolve system connectivity (RC-D7, RC-D14, RC-E24, RC-E25, RC-F1 and RC-F8).

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.8 MB

Download Here 385 Appendix I Figure 2.33
All Evaluation Section Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors which provide the best system performance and connectivity based on the transportation planning evaluation: RC-B20, RC-B22, RC-C1, RC-C2, RC-D7, RC-D14, RC-E24, RC-E25, RC-F1 and RC-F8; RCC-S3, RCC-S5 and RCC-N2.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 856 KB

Download Here 386 Appendix I Figure 3.1
Index of figures across the I-69/TTC Study Area that depict the Reasonable Corridors and Reasonable Connector Corridors which performed best in the supplemental rail performance analysis.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 872 KB

Download Here 387 Appendix I Figure 3.2
Evaluation Section B Reasonable Corridors which performed best in the supplemental rail performance analysis: RC-B20 and RC-B22.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 388 Appendix I Figure 3.3
Evaluation Section C Reasonable Corridors and Evaluation Section S Reasonable Connector Corridors which performed best in the supplemental rail performance analysis: RC-C2, RCC-S1 and RCC-S5.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 912 KB

Download Here 389 Appendix I Figure 3.4
Evaluation Section D Reasonable Corridors and Evaluation Section N Reasonable Connector Corridors which performed best in the supplemental rail performance analysis: RC-D4, RC-D7, RC-D11, RC-D14 and RCC-N1.

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.4 MB

Download Here 390 Appendix I Figure 3.5
Evaluation Sections E and F Reasonable Corridors which performed best in the supplemental rail performance analysis: RC-E24 and RC-F3

09/11/2007 Fize Size: 1.2 MB

COPYRIGHT © 2010, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TxDOT